Reviewer assigned means. Oct 27, 2023 · Meaning: Manuscript Submitted: This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. This step is important because it is the Editor-in-Chief that makes the final decision on whether your manuscript can undergo peer review. It may take longer than expected if the Academic Editor has a particularly high workload. , peer reviewers are currently reading your manuscript). If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience After being under the status 'All reviewers assigned', the manuscript status changed back to 'Manuscript Under consideration'. It is a software issue or a bug. The GE, as the name suggests, is an external editor and is assigned when the journal cannot find an 1 Recommendation. Manuscript submitted: This means that the manuscript has been successfully submitted and approved by the author. Jun 14, 2021 · Because, on the day the ADM was assigned, we received an email like - "Dear ABC, We have started the review process for your article, but wanted to mention the '2021 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 1'". Sep 11, 2017 · Answer: This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. e. ” Related reading: Why does the status change back to "Reviewers assigned" after 3 days of "Under review"? Why has my article's status changed to "Reviewers Assigned" after two days of "Under Peer-Review Process. Feb 17, 2017 · 1 Answer to this question. Mar 15, 2023 · Sorted by: 4. Following events occur in a typical review process between "With Apr 1, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate editor (Editor Sep 17, 2020 · The peer-review process can appear intimidating and complex. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE) Some journals have Associate Editors ( or equivalent) who handle the peer review. 4. This makes me think the process was started after the ADM was assigned. The Meta-Reviewer is not logging in using the email the Chair has assigned as Meta-Reviewer. 5. When status changes to under review it means at least two reviewer have responded to the 3. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience Nov 8, 2019 · What is the difference between under review and reviewers assigned? In some journals reviewer assigned status meant that reviewer has been sent the review invitation. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) The EIC checks assesses the paper, considering its scope, originality and merits. Answer: The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Share. Papers have not been assigned yet. The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Some editorial systems give the status as with editors, awaiting reviewer assignment (or similar) if a new referee needs to be assigned and no other referee is currently assigned. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. It usually takes 1–2 days. Whereas " assignees clarify who is working on specific issues and pull requests ", also from the docs. Sep 16, 2021 · In this paper, a young, senior editor provides a handbook of the peer review process based on his decadal experience in scientific publishing. Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. Junior scholars sometimes use "under second round review" to show that the paper at least got an R&R. The date changes because of the result of multiple events happening during the review process. I am not really sure what ‘EE’ means on ScholarOne. Find out more about the process and what is involved here. However, a strange observation is that the first letter of the word ‘review Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 2. It seems that the journal uses “Editor assigned” whenever that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE). Peer reviewers do it in there own time, often last thing at night so it can take some time to complete. Answer: This status change does occur occasionally. The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Custom fields do not have it. If AE feels that EIC input is needed Sep 4, 2020 · review External peer review . A previous question asked about "ADM" and the accepted answer noted ADM probably means "administrator. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Dec 28, 2023 · Conferences may use multiple review types to implement meta reviews. We received decision around one month later. For most journals, when we submit revised Jun 15, 2020 · Meaning of ‘Awaiting reviewer scores’ This status is known by different names with different journals, including ‘Under review’ and ‘Awaiting technical scores. Yes, this issue is a common scenario in Aug 3, 2020 · Answer: This dual status is a bit unusual, but it does happen. 'Under Review/In Review' can mean that your manuscript is currently assessed or 'under review' by the assigned editor. Synonyms for REVIEWER: critic, analyst, observer, commentator, columnist, pundit, referee, evaluator, annotator, appraiser Jul 27, 2022 · The people who are assigned to a merge request are the people who are responsible for it, not in a review kind of sense. Oct 9, 2018 · Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Awaiting Admin Checklist. People may decline to review for many reasons – eg they are going on holiday. Awaiting Reviewer Jun 12, 2020 · These stand for the associate editor and guest editor respectively. He covers major information you need to know during the entire process, from selecting journals to completing the proofing of your accepted paper. Once that process is complete, the reviewers will provide their feedback to the AE and the AE will get in touch with you regarding the next steps. Once, reviewers assigned they are given a period to which they have to submit their decision for the editor to forward it to you. Once the editor has accepted the invitation, the manuscript status will change to “Editor assigned. With Editor Apr 15, 2019 · Usually, the “Editor Assigned” status indicates initial editorial screening before assigning reviewers. Once this is done, it will be assigned to an Associate Editor who will be in charge of Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide to Nature Communications ’ editorial process, as of November, 2018, we formally acknowledge their Quote From Mech: Quote From TreeofLife: Agreed, this can mean under review by an editor after the peer review has been completed. Once review reports are returned, he will take a decision on your manuscript; reject or resubmit with revisions. To explain each status, ‘EIC: Not Assigned’ means that the EiC (the Editor-in-Chief) has not been assigned to the manuscript. . Nov 16, 2015 · Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Answer: For most journals, the status "under review" is used to indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external review. Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。. ’. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was ‘Under review. Whether the new reviewer would be the same old one or not depends on the availability of the reviewer and the Oct 14, 2014 · 1. Reviewing that many papers is a huge burden, and despite a preliminary bidding process, every PC member is assigned at least a few papers outside their areas of expertise. Currently, the status of your paper—Re: not assigned—indicates that a review stage is yet to be assigned or the reviewers are yet to respond to the Action Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. Since the manuscript has been sent back to the Associate Editor, the Mohd Shariq. They will determine if we need any more information from you. – Apr 12, 2022 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal in December of 2021. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in May 12, 2020 · One, there may be a conflict of interest on the part of one or all reviewer(s). A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. The meta reviewer can be one of the three reviewers, or be a fourth reviewer. The problem of getting those to review your article is sometimes responsible for the delay. If you find yourself waiting for more than a week, it’s best to contact the Assistant Editor for an update. If reviewers have requested revisions, it is common for journals to get the same set of reviewers to check the revised manuscript. In this case, it is possible that the editor is now busy and is unable to take on your manuscript at the moment, which is why the status shows Jan 25, 2017 · The reviews have been completed and the system administrator or the journal manager assigned the editor (who is assumed to be associated with it earlier) to take care of the review reports and make a call. “Under review" could either mean internal From the ‘All submissions’ list, you can now filter s by 'assigned handling editor' This includes the option to filter by ‘You’, allowing just you to see your assignments; Updated reviewer invite statuses (Editor experience) On the reviewer management table you can now see additional information including: The due date of a report Dec 27, 2016 · The requested reviewer will receive a notification that you asked them to review the pull request. Contributions submitted to the ASME Transaction Journals are first screened by the Editor-in-Chief to determine if the content of the submitted manuscript is appropriate for the scope of the journal and if the manuscript merits peer review. In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. Peer review helps to maintain high standards for published research. During this time your manuscript could be checked for formatting guidelines, the editor might judge the Apr 2, 2021 · Assigning appropriate reviewers to a manuscript from a pool of candidate reviewers is a common challenge in the academic community. The number of review reports is not sufficient. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent Sep 11, 2020 · 1 Answer to this question. ”. Apparently they are looking for a reviewer to be assigned for your revised manuscript. Jul 18, 2019 · The status “reviews completed” indicates that peer reviewers have finished evaluating your manuscript and the review reports have been sent to the journal. So, perhaps your paper is currently being screened by the Dec 7, 2015 · Each submitted paper is assigned to 2-4 PC members to review; for a typical conference this means each PC member is assigned 25-50 papers to review. The most probable explanation is that the assigned editor is inactive and did not invite reviewers (which would also explain why you never saw the status change to "under review"). The specific difference is up to the project, but the basic difference is that reviewers are expected to review, and the assignees are in charge Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. 1. Assignees, on the other hand, "clarify who is working on specific issues and pull requests. It would be re-reviewed and handled by another editor. has the responsibility of merging when all reviewers are happy and have approved or making changes according to the reviewers comments. In that approach, each paper is assigned one meta review and, say, three regular reviews. The reason could be a lack of time or availability, a mismatch with the subject area, or a conflict of interest. The assigned reviewer will review the manuscript and provide recommendations that would help the editor reach a decision on Sep 5, 2022 · What is the meaning of reviewer assigned? Reviewers assigned means that peer reviewers have been nominated and accepted. INVITING REVIEWERS Aug 2, 2021 · When the reviewers’ comments have been received, the Action Editor will make a decision, taking into account their recommendations, and you will be notified of the decision by e-mail. The quick change from ‘Editor Assigned’ to ‘Reviewer Assigned’ means that the Associate Editor (AE) had a look at your manuscript and decided that it fits the journal scope and also Apr 28, 2022 · The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. Based on the journal, ‘Under Review’ means that the manuscript is undergoing an internal (journal) review or an external (peer) review. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The EiC may reject the paper at this stage. Contact the Chairs for resolution. For most manuscripts, in the Jul 10, 2016 · The first mission of the editor is to assign reviewers and take a decision depending on their return. (For most journals, the associate editor is referred to as the AE. After two months the rest of the journal decided to invite a new editor, causing the status to move back to "editor invited". If the Reviewer desired is not in the Edit Assignments page, but is in the Reviewers tab, make note of the bullet header, ‘Assigned Reviewers / non-conflicting emergency reviewers’. Jul 15, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. While this status (the EiC’s decision) is indicated by the descriptor ‘Decision in Process ’ by most other journals, at Hindawi, it seems to be indicated by ‘Pending Approval. Either: Jun 27, 2019 · The status “Editor Invited” means an AE has been invited to handle your manuscript and the journal is waiting for her/him to accept the invitation. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. It may just be that the status changes each time the paper gets passed to a reviewer (e. Aug 8, 2014 Dec 4, 2017 · In some journals reviewer assigned status meant that reviewer has been sent the review invitation. Now this is the fourth month and the status is still the same. If they do, they would be assigned at this stage. – Sep 6, 2019 · The status ‘ED: Not Assigned’ means that an Associate Editor has not yet been assigned for your manuscript. Improve this answer. 2 – 3 weeks ; Detailed review comments . But, after that, the status changed to "Under review" for three days, and then it changed to "Reviewers assigned" again. However, if the reviewers are completely Jun 30, 2022 · In this particular case, the status "AE: Not Assigned; Submitted" simply implies that the AE is not finalized and there has been no advancement since the manuscript was submitted. Once you’ve submitted your manuscript, it will be pre-checked, and then sent for review. Evidence gathering, review, and decision We’re getting evidence from you, your health care providers, government agencies, and other sources. Initial review We assigned your claim to a reviewer. g. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Alternatively, they may have been assigned or even started the review, but may have needed to divert their attention to something more critical or with greater priority. However, the change of stats back to “reviewers assigned” indicates that at least one regarding the original reviewers might have declined the invitation to review to going through your manuscript in detail. 管理者による論文チェック待ち. The assigned editor can now take a call on whether to send your manuscript for peer review. Sep 29, 2021 · Status notifications are a three-step process that will update you when DFAS receives select forms or documents for processing by mail or fax (or in some specific cases, through AskDFAS). Apr 30, 2020 · They have then communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final call on the paper. Sep 20, 2017 · Sorted by: 1. After the editoral review, the reviewers were invited, and then the status changed to "Reviewers assigned" for two months. The exact answer of how many reviewers is journal and editor specific. It can be an indication that the Editor-in-Chief is handling Jun 19, 2020 · Now, after a month, the status has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed,’ which as the term suggests, means that the peer review has been completed. Approximately 6 weeks (may be longer if undergoing Editorial Office statistical review) Detailed review comments ; Additional review . So, after picking up the paper, they must have realized this and then pulled back. Peer Review in Progress. Required reviews complete: Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. 査読者の選出待ち. Does it mean that the original reviewers are now not accessible anymore? Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the subsequent stats “under review” means that the manuscript has are sent out for watch. Awaiting Editor Decision May 27, 2017 · Hello, I have experienced a manuscript tracking that is a little odd. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Click the dropdown next to 'Select Your Role' at the top of the page. Received and queued in the DFAS work system. In general, revised submissions are assigned to the same editor who was handling it the first time. The next step is that the AE will send your manuscript for peer review. So, the Associate Editor (AE) looked around Sep 14, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. Usually it is the person who creates the pull request who counts as responsible for it i. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Associate Editor の指名待ち. Isaac Dinaharan. You should go to the Issue navigator and type. May 27, 2020 · The manuscript was assigned to the requisite number of peer reviewers (two or three), but due to various reasons, one or more reviewers declined to review. The reviewer will determine if we need any more information from you. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. the editor gives it to reviewer #1, reviewer #1 gives it back to editor, editor gives it to reviewer #2, and so on). Meta reviews are summaries of the other in-depth paper reviews. This depends a lot on the manuscript management system, and the editorial practices. You will receive separate status notifications when your form or document is: 1. Mar 9, 2022 · He will then assign a AE or an academic editor who is usually an expert on the field the submitted manuscript belongs to. Coming to present day status, the AE is still not assigned but the manuscript is undergoing peer review. Jun 30, 2022 · Please keep in mind that the final decision rests with the Associate Editor (AE), and the reviewers only provide recommendations. This could be very likely, since you mentioned the status changed straight from 'waiting for assignment' to 'in review'. Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. Aug 5, 2020 · :-) ‘Reviewer Assigned’ means that the journal has had a look at your manuscript and decided to send it for peer review, whether internal or external. ’ Just a few hours later, another ADM was assigned, but the status is the same. In addition to points discussed above, the current status 'awaiting reviewer scores' means that your paper has been sent for a second review. We’ll review the evidence Reviewer information. ) A manuscript can have either an ED (AE) assigned or a GE, not both (unless this is for a special issue). Possibly, your paper has been assigned to an editorial assistant who will check it to see that it meets the journals requirements. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review. Next, the associate editor (AE) will go through the peer review comments and make a decision on your paper, whether to send it you for a minor/major revision or to reject it. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is Jun 14, 2021 · Because, on the day the ADM was assigned, we received an email like - "Dear ABC, We have started the review process for your article, but wanted to mention the '2021 IEEE Access Best Video Award Part 1'". b) under review (repeat as necessary): all stages of the review when the paper is not in your hands. Your work will be read and rated by a few academics from your field. The manuscript is assigned to an editor. Answer: It is clear that the journal plans to get your paper reviewed again, which is why you're seeing status changes related to these stages. Required reviews completed: Minimum number of reviews has been received. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. After three months I contacted the editor and s/he informed me that the review is still going on. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Most journals assign a manuscript number upon initial submission and send an automated notice to advise you of the number (if not now, the manuscript number will be assigned when the first editor is assigned). Now It has been changed from "Reviews assigned" to "Under review"! It means new reviewers started to review the paper! After more than 3 months!! Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). Currently, your manuscript is under Peer Review. The editor and the editorial team decide whether or not to send the manuscript out to review; the corresponding author is contacted with the decision Feb 12, 2024 · This manuscript status means that the Academic Editor is assessing the peer review process. StatusWhat it meansA Decision Review Officer is reviewing your appeal We received your Notice of Disagreement and assigned your appeal to a Decision Review Officer. After that communication with the editor, neither the editor nor the handling editor return my follow-up Feb 4, 2021 · So, your re-revised manuscript has moved to Editor Assigned after Under Review. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Action Reviewer assigned means the review process commenced. As you have suggested, you could indeed write to the editor inquiring about the back and forth of the statuses. The time it takes to fully review a paper ranges depending on the journal but typically the process takes several months. Feb 26, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. You should add a default value, but this value will not be added to the old issues. I'm not sure what JM checklist refers to, but my guess is that Nov 6, 2023 · Reviewing Your Manuscript Q&A. Nov 18, 2018 · Assignee is a system field, that is why it has the Unassigned option. However, for some other journals, ‘EE’ stands for ‘Executive Editor’ which is equivalent to Editor-in-chief. This post will walk you through the peer-review process, show you how reviewers are […] Jan 5, 2023 · We haven’t assigned the claim to a reviewer yet. Editor Invited: This step is optional and may not occur in all journals. Based on their advice, your manuscript may be accepted, returned for minor or major corrections, or They provide feedback on the paper, suggest improvements and make a recommendation to the editor about whether to accept, reject or request changes to the article. The Meta-Reviewer needs to change their Role to Meta-Reviewer. The reason with it is now Editor Assigned can be due to several reasons. Decision in process: The handling editor has drafted a decision, but it has not yet been finalized or sent to the authors. In the case of manuscripts that require revisions, it is not uncommon for journals to get them checked by reviewers once again. ’ What this means is that your manuscript has been sent for peer review and the peer review comments/opinions are presently awaited. You should use the bulk edit feature to set the default value for the old issues. This means that the peer review of the second revision is over, and now, the handling editor – either the Associate Editor (AE) or the Managing Editor (ME), as the case may be – is trying to decide on your manuscript, or at least they have been assigned to do so. Apr 13, 2021 · 1 Answer to this question. The ultimate decision always rests with the editor but reviewers play a significant role in determining the outcome. Current word- and semantic-based approaches treat the reviewer assignment problem (RAP) as an information retrieval problem but do not take into account two constraints of the RAP: incompleteness of the reviewer data and interference from nonmanuscript-related Nov 20, 2023 · Stage 2: Editor assigned Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. " Thus, your paper does not have an "administrator" assigned, but is currently under review (i. The reviewing stage is important to journal integrity. EIC stands for “Editor-in-Chief”, so “EIC not assigned” means that there is no Editor-in-Chief assigned to your manuscript. However, the change of status back to “reviewers assigned” indicates that at least one of the Sep 25, 2019 · Since the status “Reviewer assigned” appeared just a few days after submission, I think it refers to the internal review. Please review your Statement of the Case We sent you a Statement of the Case (SOC) that explains Apr 28, 2022 · The journal's Editorial team will check the submission and either send back to the author for action, or assign to an Editor. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer Jul 28, 2016 · The status "Editor Assigned" means that your paper has been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE) who will be in charge of it. This means the Reviewer is not listed as an Emergency Reviewer and cannot be assigned the paper. Going by that assumption, the status of your first manuscript "ED: Not Assigned, GE: Not Assigned, Awaiting JM Checklist" means that no action has yet been taken on your paper. Apr 24, 2023 · Legacy appeal status. This means that one or more initially assigned peer reviewers were unable to review the manuscript for any or all of a variety of reasons: unavailability, identified conflict of interest, and a mismatch with their field. However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" when the manuscript is under the initial editorial May 3, 2019 · The status "Editor assignment pending" means that your paper has still not been assigned to an editor. The AE will do an initial screening of the manuscript to check its overall scientific value and match with the scope of the paper, after which the paper will either receive a desk rejection or be sent for peer review. Some manuscript types, such as book reviews and commentaries, do not require peer review, and in rare Apr 18, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. No need to write "in preparation" -- this is assumed. With Editor 6. When status changes to under review it means at least two reviewer have responded to the invitation and accepted to review the manuscript. The most common reason why a paper is stuck at this stage is that one or more reviewers may have declined the review invitation compelling the editor to Jul 15, 2019 · 1 Answer toward this question. It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Others will show under review regardless. " In sum, the difference is whether you'd like to ask someone to work on fixing an issue or 1. What does this brief "Under review" means? Why dit it change to "Reviewers It means the Editor wants to assign your manuscript to a reviewer. Within a couple of days the status changed to "assigning for review". " However, if one or more reviewers decline the Apr 8, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. If the manuscript lies outside the scope of the journal, then a rapid rejection Apr 26, 2017 · 1 Answer. Awaiting AE Assignment. For a pull request, you can now "request a review explicitly from collaborators, making it easier to specify who you'd like to review your pull request. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Sep 3, 2019 · Generally speaking, “Reviewer Assigned” means that the manuscript has been assigned to a peer reviewer, that is, invitations have been sent out to peer reviewers to review your manuscript. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. Mar 27, 2020 · The present status of ‘Assigning for Review,’ which has remained for a month, probably means the editor is still looking for reviewers for your manuscript. However, it is an essential element of scientific publishing, ensuring that a manuscript is relevant and suitable for publication and upholding scientific integrity. A conflict arose and the papers were re-assigned. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience Jul 3, 2019 · Whatever the reason, the editor will have to look for a new reviewer for your manuscript which is why the status has changed to “reviewer assigned. Fine, but don't take this further: under 2nd or 3rd R&R is not impressive. Hence the first Editor Assigned to Under Review. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. rm qm au mj ad ys mj bh px vs